Good Map:
In my opinion, the above map demonstrates several qualities that make it a good map. This National Geographic map has a clear title, which can be found at the bottom of the map. It is titled "The World, Satellite Map." The layout appears professional, with four insets surrounding the main map. The insets each illustrate a different geographic phenomenon. Every continent and major geographic feature is labeled with a proper font size that does not overwhelm the map. The map displays desert regions, tropical regions, and arctic regions. We also notice mountain ranges and valleys, fulfilling its purpose as a physical map. The source of the map, National Geographic, is clearly identified. Also, scale bars exist for the smaller insets. Overall, this map is incredibly visually appealing, and successfully relays its important information. This map is most definitely a good map.
Bad Map:
On the other hand, I would consider this map of Malta to be a bad map. I found this map on a website promoting tourism of Malta, containing several different maps. First of all, I am not even sure of the purpose of this map. It has no title, no legend, and no scale bar. The source of the map is also missing. Cities are not even labeled. The map is not geographically accurate, and I do not understand why no points of interest are labeled. The map also does not represent the physical features of the island. The map labels no attractions, no mountain ranges, and no valleys. If the point of this map is in fact to promote tourism, then this map falls far short of selling Malta as an exciting destination. This bad and unprofessional map may be visually appealing, but it is not accurate and possesses several flaws.
Part 2: Census 2000 Exercise:
No comments:
Post a Comment